Which is better - BMW X3 or Lexus NX? Children of different auto cultures. x32 and x64. What is the difference and what is best for you

  • Processor - AMD Jaguar, 8 cores (2.1 GHz)
  • Graphics - 32 AMD Radeon units (911 MHz)
  • Memory — 8GB GDDR5, 218Gb/s + 1GB DDR3
  • Performance Rating - 4.2 Tflops

As you can see above, the xbox one hardware is 42.8% faster than the ps4 pro and more than 4.5 times faster than the standard xbox one. Obviously, Microsoft decided to bet on power. Such a gap was achieved due to the increased amount of RAM and the use of a more advanced graphics core. But what does this give us? In theory, higher frame rates when gaming on 4K screens. More bandwidth equals more frame rates.

The most important test - games

Since we paid due attention to design and other innovations in the reviews of each of the consoles: the xbox one x review and the playstation 4 pro review, we will focus on the most important thing, the games. And to be more precise, on the graphics in games. We will break this part into two parts: gaming in 4K and gaming in FullHD. This approach is due to the fact that both consoles offer to try new standard screen resolution, but with reservations.

4K gaming

Let's say right away that the 4K standard has not yet replaced FullHD - not everyone has a screen with such a resolution. Yes and games in true 4K/60fps on this moment very little.

Clearly about the difference in HD, FullHD and 4K sizes

In order to achieve a resolution of 3840x2160 on the ps4 pro, checkerboard rendering scaling technology is used. in plain language, the console in the new frame redraws half of the pixels in a checkerboard pattern, and the remaining gaps are filled with pixels from the previous frame, but in accordance with the new positions of neighboring pixels. Thanks to this technology, games like Horizon Zero Dawn and Rise of the Tomb Raider look decent in 4K / 30fps on ps4 pro. Honest 4K/60fps is available on quite a few games. Basically, these are indie projects.

It would be logical to assume that the xbox one x with its power will produce 4K / 60fps in all games. But, unfortunately, this is not the case. Some older games have only received a patch that will make games look better on the xbox one than on the standard version of the console. Some games received support for HDR (advanced color processing technology), which requires an appropriate TV, and which, by the way, is also supported by ps4 pro. Some games for xbox one x still support 4K/60fps, some have this resolution but with 30fps.

Maximum resolution in some games on ps4 pro and xbox one x

For all its power, the xbox one x doesn't do anything spectacular when playing at 4K resolution. Subjectively, from a distance of two or two and a half meters from the sofa to the TV, the difference is no longer noticeable. But, in fairness, we note that there are significantly more games in real 4K on xbox one than on ps4 pro.

Good old, honest FullHD

But in FullHD, both consoles deliver stable 60 frames per second in all games, and even with graphical bonuses compared to playing on standard consoles. If we compare graphics in this resolution on xbox one x and on ps4 pro (video below), then, firstly, it is difficult to notice the difference, and secondly, in some games the graphics are better on xbox one x, in some - on ps4 pro :

And this video proves that the graphics on the xbox one are better:

Perhaps this has something to do with the features of the engine of a particular game. Perhaps with something else. But in fact, there is not much difference.

So let's sum up. Both ps4 pro and xbox one x fall short of "fair" gaming in 4K. The Playstation 4 Pro falls short more. But both consoles do an excellent job with FullHD, offering also graphic goodies to their owners.

Results

What we end up with is that the xbox one x is more powerful than the competitor and has support for 4K Blu-ray, and there are more games in real 4K on the brainchild of Microsoft. But, as practice has shown, more power does not give anything significant, except for more power. Test Battlefield 1 loaded 3 seconds faster on xbox one x than on ps4 pro. It's on load network game, which lasts more than a minute. Movies on 4K Blu-ray will be watched in best case 1% of all users. The graphics in games, if you do not peer under a magnifying glass, are the same. Except maybe 4K screens.

As you can see, even though the xbox one x is more expensive, the console could be recommended for purchase by all owners of 4K TVs. The Americans managed to do a good product. But there is one "but", which practically crosses out all the advantages. These are games. Just take a look at the list of all the ps4 exclusives you'll miss if you buy an xbox one x. Also, do not forget that the playstation 4 consoles already have support for a VR helmet.

Verdict

If the xbox one x had at least 3/4 of all the exclusives that are on the ps4 and with the same quality, and the 4K standard is not the future, but the current reality, then the console could be recommended for purchase. At the moment, ps4 pro looks like a more interesting acquisition for a gamer, besides, the platform already supports a helmet virtual reality which cannot be said about a competitor. If you have a Full HD TV, then feel free to choose ps4 pro. If your TV supports 4K and HDR10, then just as boldly choose ps4 pro, and for the saved difference of $ 50 buy good game according to your taste. Most likely, you will play on a game console, and not peer into the clarity of pixels under magnification.

Consoles are for playing. And in order to play them, they need games. And Sony remembers it.

See also comparison of all versions of xbox one: how xbox's differ - comparison of Microsoft consoles from regular to xbox one x.

Many thanks for your attention to the article. Unfortunately, the comment box is not ready yet. Therefore, if you have any questions, then leave them under a similar video on my subject. YouTube channel. I will be glad to answer all your questions.

Every time before an Apple presentation, we expect something supernatural, innovative. The iPhone Xs / Xs Max, presented on September 12, 2018, is not a breakthrough, but they really have a lot of interesting things. Even owners of the iPhone X may experience an irresistible desire to change their "ten" to one of the new models. So, in order.

Screens: now also 6.5 inches

iPhone Xs received a 5.8-inch Super Retina OLED screen with a pixel density of 458 PPI, the model with the Max index is 6.5-inch. Despite the increase in display sizes, the size of the gadgets themselves have not grown so much. That is, it is assumed that they will still be comfortable to hold in your hand, like previous models. The 6.5-inch display is the largest in iPhone history. It's not just the size that's changed, though: the dynamic range of the new screens is 60% greater than the iPhone X's, so colors should look even more realistic.

The new A12 Bionic chip will speed up work by 30-50%

A12 Bionic is one of the first chips made using 7nm technology. I would like to say “first”, but a little earlier, Huawei has already introduced its Kirin 980. Anyway, what does this give the user? A12 Bionic is capable of processing 5 trillion operations per second, while the previous A11 is only 600 billion. “In practice”, this opens up new opportunities for resource-intensive tasks - for example, working with augmented reality. Applications on the new iPhone Xs / Xs Max will open on average 25-30% faster, for some operations smartphones will work up to 2 times faster.

Internal memory - up to 512 GB!

The miracle did not happen: Apple is not going to step over itself and use memory cards in their smartphones. Instead, the company is offering more and more onboard storage. The maximum capacity of the iPhone Xs Max is 512 GB! Think about it, half a terabyte! So much and not on every laptop there. While it's hard to imagine how such a huge supply can be used, but who knows how much the applications for these smartphones with AR and other "chips" will take.

New cameras: truly professional quality

iPhone Xs / Xs Max received two main cameras with a wide-angle and telephoto lens, 12 megapixels each. They have a really new stuffing. Of course, the high quality of photos is also achieved through software. The Smart HDR function allows you to take 4 frames at once with different exposures and “glue” them into one. Separately, it is worth mentioning the possibility of manually adjusting the background blur, and this can already be done on finished images. The 7MP selfie camera has a faster sensor than the iPhone X and f/2.2 aperture. Here, too, there is a "Portrait" mode with high-quality background blur.

Battery: a new battery life record

It makes no sense to compare battery capacity - rather, the duration of the gadget on a single charge is important. iPhone Xs, as they promise, will be able to work for half an hour longer (yes, only half an hour), Xs Max - for as much as one and a half. Both gadgets support wireless charging and are able to replenish up to 50% of the energy reserve in just 30 minutes.

Face ID will work faster and more accurately

First of all, the use of a new processor affected the speed of work. The Secure Enclave module will be able to compare the “map” of the face with the template much faster, and the iPhone Xs has a function to track changes in the owner’s face. The Neural Engine machine learning system will improve the quality of face recognition - even difficult lighting conditions or makeup will not be a problem.

Aside from a more powerful processor, dust and water resistance support, and a new gold color, one of the most notable changes from last year's flagship is the camera.

Well-known journalist John Gruber decided to devote maximum time to this particular functionality of the new flagship. He spent dozens of hours comparing iPhone X and iPhone XS. Well, it will be interesting to read his findings and decide whether to upgrade to the iPhone XS.

Photos are the main strength of the iPhone XS

Normal people don't update their smartphone every year. Moreover, many do not dare to buy a new smartphone even after two years, waiting for the moment when their current gadget either breaks down or becomes too slow.

So, upgrading from iPhone 7 to iPhone XS, you can experience dozens of benefits. And the camera is one of them.

The wide-angle lens system has been extensively redesigned and improved on iPhone XS. Everything is like in good retro optics: light passes through the lens and hits the sensor. But it's not just about optics.

HDR has been around on iPhones for a long time. But, almost always, I disable this feature. With the advent of Smart HDR in the iPhone XS, things seem to be about to change. Here is a visual example of a comparison between a photo taken on the iPhone X and iPhone XS.

Regarding the exposition, everything is clear without comment. Of course, I did not process the images additionally. In this case, both files weigh approximately 2.2 megabytes each. There is a difference.

And here's another example of Smart HDR at work: a backlight that flattens the iPhone X but doesn't cause problems for the iPhone XS.

iPhone X on the left, iPhone XS on the right.

The difference is impressive. No additional processing. My wife just sat across from me and took two pictures. First on the iPhone X, and then, from the same angle, on the iPhone XS.

New wide-angle lens and sensor

When I first started comparing the shots taken on the iPhone X and iPhone XS, I noticed that the iPhone XS shoots from a slightly higher angle. That is, it covers more space, and the photos turned out a little wider.

Apple later confirmed that the iPhone XS does indeed have a different wide-angle lens. His focal length is 26 mm. Not much wider, but still noticeable when shooting.

Looking at the EXIF ​​data of photos from the iPhone XS, the change in focal length is only 0.25mm, with the iPhone X at 4.0mm and the iPhone XS at 4.25mm. It seemed like a negligible difference. But do not forget that the focal length of the same "telephoto" (lens) is only 6 mm.

Purely in numbers, the difference is negligible. But it is noticeable directly when shooting. And the iPhone XS also plays into the hands of the fact that the camera matrix of the new flagship is larger.

In the description of the iPhone XS on the official website, a little is written about the camera of the smartphone:

Capture smaller details. The iPhone XS sensor has deeper and larger pixels. This contributes to a significant improvement in image quality. And more light hits the matrix. What is the result? Improved photo quality even in low light.

From the official iPhone XS description

But what does Apple mean by "more"? To find out, I used special calculators that allow you to calculate the size of camera sensors.

Well, I got an impressive number. If you believe the calculations, then the iPhone XS has a sensor that is 30% larger than the iPhone X. At the same time, Apple did not follow the well-trodden path of OEM marketers.

Considering that the iPhone XS has increased the sensor, the company could easily increase the resolution of the camera. For example, from 12 MP to almost 16 MP. Isn't it a great publicity stunt?

But no, Apple didn't do that. She took care of increasing the "depth" of each pixel. As a result, the sensor has increased by 30%, but at the same time iPhone camera XS receives 50% more light.

And one more non-obvious, but no less important change. In the iPhone XS, the camera sensor is installed slightly deeper into the body. Apple moved it away from the lens group, thereby achieving a qualitative improvement in photos.

This was the sensor in the iPhone 7.

Given all these changes, which are practically not advertised by Apple itself, one thing can be said. The company did not invent something new and it cannot be called an innovation. But buyers of the iPhone XS will receive a smartphone with the best camera among iOS devices.

If you own an iPhone 6, 6s, 7 or 8 (as well as "Plus" models), when you buy an iPhone XS you will notice a dramatic improvement in everything. Owners of the iPhone X should upgrade only if the quality of photos is the determining criterion when choosing a smartphone. Well, as a bonus, you can get an increased diagonal of the OLED display. [

Choosing a good car in the premium class has become more than just difficult. In Russia, this segment is represented plentifully, all manufacturers are trying to get into a rather crowded group of German and Japanese market leaders. It is these two elements of cars that we will compare today. The youthful and perky Lexus NX from the Japanese side has become a harbinger of very serious changes in the corporation's approach to its models. The car received an aggressive style, there was no trace of its former greatness and pathos. The opponent of the Japanese crossover in today's comparison will be the German no less expensive and advanced BMW X3. This is a medium-sized SUV with very high requirements for operating conditions. But this car embodies success, style, automotive classics and modern technologies simultaneously. These outstanding representatives came under our gaze.

Choosing a Bavarian or Japanese crossover will turn out to be a real challenge for a potential buyer. Money in this class does not solve everything, it only helps to make right choice. There are a lot of both one and other cars on the roads of Russia, so not a single representative will also take popularity. Complete comparison does not make much sense. Both cars have just about everything that can be put into a modern car. So, how to make a decision in such a difficult battle? Let's take a look at all the features of crossovers without haste and compare even the most ridiculous features of transport. Perhaps it is in such a dispute that the real truth is born. True, we can immediately say that when choosing a Lexus or BMW, the truth will be different for everyone. It is unlikely that anyone will want to change their principles for the sake of experiments. Fans of Europeans will choose the X3, and admirers of the Japanese elite segment will definitely change to the NX.

Lexus NX - what's interesting about this handsome man?

A couple of years ago, this was the most anticipated new product from the corporation, which occupied the first positions in search queries all over the world. Today it is already a familiar car, without which it is difficult to imagine the Lexus model line. The car has taken its niche and has become an excellent offer on the market. Of course, lovers of that old Lexus waited a bit before adopting such a development philosophy for the company. But in the end, everything went well for the manufacturer, and here's why:

  • the base engine in the 200 and 200 AWD models has 150 horsepower, it is quite pleasant to work and does not require a lot of gasoline, the automatic spurs the machine on perfectly;
  • a similar 200 t engine also has a turbine and offers 238 horsepower, which makes the car a sports car, only all-wheel drive and excellent equipment are already available here;
  • the most expensive option is a hybrid 300 h with a power plant for 197 forces, but the consumption goes to a minimum, and the dynamics remain excellent, the configurations are the most expensive;
  • the traditional 6-band automatic is not only good in operation, it rushes the car from any conditions remarkably, provides low consumption and does not cause technical problems;
  • appearance cars and interior surprises, there are many new and fresh solutions, which speak of the courage of the brand and its vision of the future, the car really outperforms all rivals.

If we evaluate cars from the point of view of modernity, it would be the Lexus NX that would take the laurels of the championship in this nomination. The design is simply amazing, it does not get bored and does not turn out to be overly aggressive. It is pleasant to drive a typewriter, but there is a feeling of too expensive finishing. If you change to a Lexus with a cheaper car, at first you will feel like in a museum of high art. But over time, this feeling passes, and luxury is taken for granted.

BMW X3 - is the Bavarian worse in its operation?

The range of proposed technical units is much larger, and manufacturability surpasses even the proposals of more expensive cars. X3 is able to please even with its aristocratic appearance, which many consider too ascetic. The database contains a simple 2-liter gasoline engine for 184 horses, but it interests us the least. The most interesting features of the car are:

  • the second engine in the line in Russian salons is a 2-liter diesel engine with 190 horsepower, an excellent engine that is sold both in tandem with mechanics and with a traditional automatic machine;
  • not at all economical, but very powerful gasoline engines in the 28i and top 35i versions are simply unique, they give unlimited travel opportunities in any conditions;
  • the older diesel 30d offers 258 horsepower and rides no worse than its main rivals in the model line, expensive equipment makes the experience even better;
  • there is a solution for any customer in the model line, so you can choose a complete set and technical equipment exclusively for your needs.

The Germans stand out for their attitude to trim levels. Probably, even in a large Russian city you will not find two completely identical BMW X3 cars. Great amount additional equipment and the free customization makes buying a real adventure. The machine is able to surprise with its manufacturability, although in appearance it is not much different even from previous generations.

We measure prices - X3 vs. NX in an unequal fight

The Japanese have always approached the production of cars more practical. And this gives them certain advantages in this case. Interestingly, companies from Germany are also striving to simplify the proposed model range. But they fail to do this from generation to generation. The base cost of Lexus is 2,256,000 rubles. In the database for X3, you will have to pay a little more - 2,670,000 rubles. In general, the Japanese in this case has a number of advantages:

  • the equipment even in the poorest version is very impressive, there are a number of security options, excellent options for customizing the driver's seat and front passenger seat;
  • pleases the climate that creates a comfortable temperature for each passenger in the cabin, finishing immediately from expensive and practical materials with a long service life;
  • there is no doubt that everyone will be able to get comfortable in this car and find an excellent mode of operation, there are a lot of technological delights already in the basic version;
  • in more expensive trim levels, the high cost of design also increases significantly, so you won’t look for a long time for what you overpaid in the cabin, since the advantages are visible to the naked eye;
  • the maximum price of the most charged NX is 3,422,000 rubles, while for the most expensive BMW, even without a hybrid engine, you will have to pay 3,580,000 rubles.

On a test drive, it's hard not to feel the difference between these two representatives of different cultures. They went to the Olympus of their class in completely different ways, and now they are forced to compete with each other. But after a detailed study of the car, you may notice that the cars are not at all competitors to each other. They are designed for different classes and meet the needs of completely different buyers.

Are there any other interesting alternatives on the market?

A thankless task - to look for applicants for a replacement for the BMW X3 or Lexus NX. But it is impossible not to consider even hypothetical competitors in the review of these two cars. Moreover, in various classes today simply amazing new items are presented, which are far from always known. potential buyers. The public will clearly be delighted by comparing elite crossovers with such market representatives:

  1. Range Rover Evoque. The British bully is not very actively sold, but is an excellent contender both in technology and in appearance. The cost in the basic version is 2.6 million.
  2. Infiniti QX50. This is another Japanese car that is trying to compete with Lexus. It does not sell well in Russia, but in Europe it catches up with its rivals in terms of rating. Cost - from 2.2 million.
  3. Mercedes-Benz GLA. This is a German who can win the heart of any admirer of beautiful classic design. With its cost of 2.17 million rubles, it is a direct rival to the Bavarian for the palm.
  4. Cadillac SRX. Americans are still present in the Russian market, but they compete only at the class level. However, Cadillac is sold in Moscow due to its unusual appearance and small presence on the roads. Price from 2.1 million.
  5. Volvo XC60. The machine, in anticipation of its landmark update, will soon become another serious contender in the segment. This is an option for those who are already tired of the Germans and Japanese. In the database today, a car costs a little more than 2.3 million.

Among the rivals can also be called Audi, Toyota, Nissan, Renault and other representatives of the middle and upper class. But it is unlikely that anyone will consider the comparison of X3 and Nissan Murano or Renault Koleos serious. These are rivals only in the formal class, but the players are completely different levels. So let's focus on the competitors presented and admit that Lexus and BMW are outperforming them in many ways.

We offer you to watch a video review of these two crossovers in comparison with other representatives of the class:

Summing up

Modern cars can surprise with their incredible combination of beauty and technical excellence. This statement is completely true if we are talking about the brainchild of BMW or the elite division of Toyota - Lexus. Today, these brands have taken a leading position in sales and have become a virtual monopoly in the sale of very expensive crossovers. Of course, there is competition, and many rivals are also selling well. But identifying certain rivals is becoming increasingly difficult.

Each buyer will decide for himself which car he trusts more. The Germans captivate with their manufacturability, classic grandeur and amazing versions. Also, the X3 has a number of diesel powertrains and cars on the mechanics. Lexus does not have this, but there is a hybrid power plant, a futuristic youthful appearance and simply excellent reliability of each node. In general, these representatives of the market are definitely worth each other, their rivalry looks beautiful and brings a lot of pleasure to car lovers. What car would you choose for yourself?

We collide foreheads PS4 Pro, Xbox One X and PC to figure out what to play on in an era of slow but steady popularization of 4K resolution.

Gambling https://www.site/ https://www.site/

iron shop

The gaming industry has not yet grown up to Ultra HD 4K resolution (3840x2160): for gamers this is too expensive an enterprise, and developers do not really know how to score eight million pixels on the screen. You remember that FullHD monitors did not immediately come to every home.

Surprisingly, console manufacturers tried to make the new standard mass and affordable: Sony And Microsoft. Today we will compare PS4 Pro And Xbox One X, we will try to outline a plan for buying a PC of similar characteristics and answer the question of whether it is worth chasing 4K in a world dominated by 1920x1080 resolution.

PS4 Pro

Let's start with the one who first jumped over his head, that is, with Sony and its PS4 Pro. The system went on sale on November 10, 2016 at a price of 35,000 rubles. Compared to the regular PS4, the novelty is not far ahead: the same processor ( AMD Jaguar, eight cores), but with a frequency increased from 1.6 to 2.1 GHz, a modified graphics module (there were 36 computing units, the speed increased to 911 MHz), the same memory, only 1 GB DDR3 is now allocated in support of 8 GB GDDR5 , and not 256 MB, but the throughput has increased from 176 to 218 Gb / s.

Which begs the question - how does the PS4 Pro handle 4K? And in a roundabout way - in particular, upscaling (scaling) the frame! Sony has adopted checkerboard rendering, one of the upscaling methods: in this case, 50% of the image is rendered, the missing data is taken from the buffer where the previous frame is stored, and neighboring pixels. Thus, the console honestly renders every second pixel.

Thanks to checkerboard rendering on PS4 Pro at 3840x2160, for example, Horizon Zero Dawn(at 30 fps), Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare(60 fps) and Rise of the Tomb Raider(30 fps). In some games (say, in the same Rise of the Tomb Raider), developers offer users a choice - 4K at 30 fps, Full HD at 60 fps (recall that a regular PS4 is capable of a maximum of 1080p / 30 fps) or Full HD with elaborate effects . Something similar can be found in Nioh .

Sony clearly communicates to the audience the difference between HD, Full HD and Ultra HD 4K.

Checkerboard rendering isn't Sony's only trick. PS4 Pro also saves dynamic resolution. In Nioh, Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor And Diablo 3 the quality of the picture changes depending on the workload of the scene - roughly speaking, if there are a lot of enemies on the screen, the resolution drops. In natural 4K at 60 fps, very few games function on the PS4 Pro: FIFA 17 , Mantis Burn Racing, PES 17 , Wheels of Aurelia and various indie projects.

Why is there 4K - PS4 Pro even honest 1440p overcomes with difficulty and groaning. And yet, buying a console can justify itself: if the “old” game received the appropriate patch, then on the “firmware” it will work in 1080p, maybe even at 60 fps and with ennobled visual effects.

Well, there are isolated exceptions like Horizon Zero Dawn, showing the fangs and muscles of the Pro version in all its glory. And although the PS4 Pro is selling very well, it should be noted that part of its success is due to the fact that the regular PS4 has managed to thoroughly become outdated.

To fully experience the delights of the PS4 Pro without a 4K TV that is "friends" with HDR will not succeed.

Xbox One X

Microsoft condescendingly looked in the direction of a competitor for half a year and half-heartedly listened to not quite correct marketing promises in order to dot the “e” at E3 2017. Xbox One X, formerly known as Project Scorpio, left no stone unturned by the PS4 Pro.

The console is based on an eight-core processor with a frequency of 2.3 GHz (it is possible that we have an old familiar AMD Jaguar, carefully modified by Microsoft engineers), a graphics subsystem with forty computing units at a speed of 1172 MHz (slightly more than AMD Radeon RX 480) and 12 GB of GDDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 326 Gb / s. If developers under PS4 Pro have 5.5 GB of memory available, then in the case of Xbox One X, the situation is much more rosy - 8 GB.

Xbox One X is, firstly, the most productive console in history, and secondly, the most compact in the Xbox lineup.

To date, it is known that developers Forza Motorsport 7 , Project CARS 2 And F1 2017 aimed at 4K/60 fps. The teams responsible for Middle-earth: Shadow of War And Crackdown 3, requests are a little more modest - 4K / 30 fps. In the second category marks and Gears of War 4- Just like on PS4 Pro, many projects released before the launch of the console will receive special patches. We add that individual games (the same Forza Motorsport 7) will support HDR- a technology that emphasizes the transitions between shades of black and white.

But no matter how powerful the Xbox One X may seem, it also does not shy away from the “chess” rendering. Of the games presented at E3 2017, attentive journalists noticed the “corpse spots” of upscaling in Assassin's Creed Origins And Anthem .

Among the trump cards of the Microsoft console is backward compatibility. We are talking about games not only from the Xbox 360, but also from the first Xbox.

In order not to mislead gamers, Microsoft will start gluing icons on games in the fall. Buyers may see the icons "HDR" (we explained about it a little higher) and "4K Ultra HD" - this will mean support for honest 4K, 3840x2160, using upscaling or dynamic resolution. There will also be a third icon, "Xbox One X Enhanced", which can be translated as "we did some work, but we didn't make it to 4K."

Xbox One X will appear in stores on November 7, the cost in the Russian Federation is 39,990 rubles. It turns out that the PS4 Pro song is sung? Well, she will have to make room in the market. Paying only $100 on top (exactly 5,000 rubles in the Russian Federation), you get an order of magnitude more powerful CPU and GPU, an impressive amount of memory, a 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray optical drive (the PS4 Pro does not have it), and a faster hard drive. In addition, Xbox One X has added support for AMD FreeSync. The essence of this technology is simple: the display adjusts to the frame rate of the video chip, and there are no unpleasant picture breaks.

Why did we put the picture with Xbox One S? For some reason, Microsoft decided that the PS4 Pro is a rival to the Xbox One S. That is, the Xbox One X is no match.

PC

Microsoft is comparing the Xbox One X console to a $1,500 computer. Of course, the employees of the Redmond corporation are cunning. Do you want facts? Please.

From our last year test NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, GTX 1070 And GTX 1080 it’s easy to understand that even the GTX 1080 alone can’t handle 4K at “maximum speed”. It would be a mistake to believe that inside the Xbox One X there are expensive “organs” like the GTX 1080. As the editors of the magazine rightly deduced PC World, Microsoft's "superconsole" is roughly equivalent to a PC tuned for 4K at 30 fps on medium graphics settings.

PC World assembled such a computer for $652 (the price is relevant for mid-June, when the cryptocurrency fever just straightened its shoulders). Processor included AMD FX-8300(eight cores, 3.3 GHz), motherboard ASRock 970 Pro3(with socket AM3+, support for DDR3 RAM and without Wi-Fi module), die Patriot Signature with 8 GB DDR3-1600 card Radeon RX 580 with 8 GB ( DNS indicates that now this will cost 30,000 rubles), a hard drive Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB (7200 rpm), power supply Thermaltake Smart(550 W) and housing Thermaltake Versa H21. Excluding disk drive and license Windows 10 Home the assembly will cost you about 60,000 rubles.

Instead of the Radeon RX 580, you can take the GTX 1060 with 6 GB of memory (25,500 rubles). Or wait until the shelves are located freely Radeon RX Vega 56 And RX Vega 64. However, PC World is not limited to one configuration, but offers a more expensive one: with Core i5-7400(four cores, 3 GHz) and ASRock Fatal1ty Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac.

The Radeon RX Vega family is AMD's new hope for the graphics card market. RX Vega 56 is predicted to compete with the GTX 1070, RX Vega 64 - with the GTX 1080.

Not all the "iron" press is in solidarity with PC World (especially since a month and a half has passed since the publication), some put, for example, on a bunch AMD Ryzen 3 1200(four cores, 3.1 GHz), MSI B350M Gaming Pro, Radeon RX 570(24,500 rubles), and then accessories to your taste. Using a cheaper graphics chip can reduce the cost of the system to 50,000 rubles. Agree, this is much closer to the Xbox One X.

PS4 Pro is attractive because it fixes the mistakes of its predecessor: here you get stable 1080p / 60 fps, fast downloads, and an obvious hint to use PS VR paired with a more powerful set-top box. Sony has carefully taken a look at the 4K market, but isn't ready to jump head first into the water just yet.

The Xbox One X boasts "4K without compromise," but it has enough simplifications, otherwise there would be no warning icons. And the surge in mining had a bad effect on the PC segment - cryptocurrency miners stole all serious video cards. So for now, we advise you to wait until November, when the Xbox One X goes on sale, and hope that by then the situation has cleared up.

We recommend reading